UPDATE: Amber V. and some other readers spotted an error in the ruleset for applying green labels. I’ve corrected that rule now and re-uploaded the zip file. Please continue to post improvements and ideas in the comments as I’ll be collecting them for a later update article to this methodology.
This screencast demonstrates the use of Hazel to keep my Inbox, Outbox and Pending folders tidy, including labeling the files in them based on age and whether I’ve accessed them.
Links in the sidebar aren’t working, it would seem, so here’s a link to download the rules for the time being.
Before starting, however, please note that there are some links and downloads to the right. You can jump over to Noodlesoft to grab a beta of the 2.0 version of Hazel and I’ve also provided download links for the Hazel rules that I’m using in this screencast. Download them, try them (cautiously when it comes to deleting stuff) and let me know how they are working for you!
Keep in mind that this the current Hazel 2.0 is beta software. Do yourself a *huge* favor right now and go to this Noodlesoft forum thread for the most recent beta update information. You will need to make a user account, but it’s quick and painless and will keep you abreast of the updated releases. Lovely.


Comments
Word of warning
I followed your first “No mercy” cleanup trick, and moved all previous Desktop stuff to “To be deleted on X” folder. And now these Desktop Hazel rules matched and marked almost 5 GB of random old stuff in there with red labels :)
It would be better if the Desktop rules specifically looked for Inbox/Outbox/Pending folder names, not applying to all of the possible folders.
Re: Word of warning
Good point. If you want to reverse that, just go into the red label rule and set it to use “no label” instead of the red label and it will “fix” that folder. I’ll look at refining the rule in that download as well.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Awesome. I’ve tested Hazel before but never really used it but this really shows how useful it is.
Thanks for a great serie of screencasts, my desktop is already much cleaner.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Great series of screencasts! Another rule that might be helpful: move all files on desktop to inbox except for inbox/outbox/pending (after the skip aliases and saved searches). This will force you to keep that desktop clean.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I actually had that one in the ruleset when I was testing, but the “run on subfolders” rule resulted in items in the outbox and pending folder getting moved to the inbox as well. I have an idea how to solve it. If I get it working I’ll post it (if you get it working first, please post!).
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I just added a rule for Desktop after the first one (Skip alias and saved searches):
Move files to inbox Name is not Outbox Name is not Inbox Name is not Pending
Move file to Inbox
Then it continue with the next rule (“Run these rules inside desktop folders”)
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Yes, I tried this too, and even though I put the rule above the “run on subfolders” rule, it still tries to run on the outbox and pending folders, and items contained within Inbox.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
A quick way to keep your desktop clean is to open its info dialog and mark it as locked. That way you’ll be forced to think about why you are trying to put things on the desktop. The quick workaround will be to unlock the Desktop temporarily.
I got the sweep to inbox working by making the Desktop hazel rules only worry about the sleep. I imported the Desktop recipe Kinkless provided into rules for Inbox, Outbox and Pending, and tweaked to suit.
Hazel seems nice, but it would be better if we could make “recipes” that we can attach to lists of folders, etc. It seems to only allow one recipe per folder.
Archive, Devonthink Pro, & Yojimbo?
Great screencast as always Ethan!
I’m curious though.. I see you also have Yojimbo constantly running in the background, yet you seem to have a great system in your archive folder (and devonthink) already — what value is Yojimbo adding to your work flow? Where does it come into play? Perhaps an idea for another screencast?
Keep it up!
Re: Archive, Devonthink Pro, & Yojimbo?
Yojimbo is a pure reference storage location for me. Yojimbo’s strengths are the ease of storing encrypted materials and I’m currently a heavy user of its serial number and password management features. I use it’s text notes feature for functional reference lists (web site configuration notes) and about half of these are encrypted.
I have an article roughed out already about my use of yojimbo, devonthink pro, scrivener, etc. and the role they each play in my application ecosystem. I’m on the road right now but will try to get it up in the coming weeks!
about rule - Delete if older than one day
I don’t understand why is the date added in this rule is “is not in the last 1 day” when it should have been “is in the last 1 day”
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I added a ten minute delay to the “Delete empty folder” rules, because often I like to package up assorted files that belong together, and then drag the whole folder off to the archive or pending areas. I found that the default rules supplied would delete the empty folder even as I was selecting items to drop in to it. I figure 10 minutes is enough time to get thing pre-organised, but not so long that clutter becomes a factor.
Then, I added some colouring to the Pending folder. I used blue to mark when something has not been touched in a week. I have a two-layered approaching to things that are in progress. I like the idea of having immediate projects right on the desktop, and Pending is perfect for that, but there are some projects which take a long time to complete (perhaps even many months, or years in the case of books), that shouldn’t be in Pending. So I have another directory in my Home called Working. I could just use Archive, but I want to have a good solid line between things I’m doing and things I have completed (or things which I have collected as research, as the case may be). If I ever need to “promote” a project back to active status, then I can drag it back into Working (or Pending). Marking week old projects in Pending is a good way to remind myself that it should probably now go to Working, unless I intend to finish it within a few days. That keeps Pending clean for just the things that I am immediately working on, without risking losing them in Archive.
Another good use of the Working/Archive dichotomy is in tracking project versions. Periodically, a project will come to the point where I want to save a milestone. Moving a copy from Working to Archive is a clear signal that one is older than the other. With diligent naming conventions, I can easily make a Smart Folder within Working projects which automatically collects these older version from Archive, for quick reference.
Incidentally: Is anyone else having trouble posting from Firefox? I simply cannot get past the captcha validation. I had to load up Safari to post this.
Error in green label rule?
Also, is it just me or is the Desktop rule that colours things green backwards? For me, it is colouring everything that I’ve clicked on; but not the things that I haven’t touched yet. I changed the operand from “is after” to “is before” and now it seems to work as advertised, even though that expression doesn’t really make sense.
Re: Error in green label rule?
I have the same problem. I downloaded the rules from the link on this page, so I’m surprised no one but you has mentioned it. I’ll try doing what you did to fix it, and hopefully it works for me.
Ethan-thanks for the screencasts. They have been very insightful, and I can’t wait to share them with others.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Is there anything that Hazel can do, or do easily, that Automator can’t do (well or easily)?
My initial reaction to trying Hazel is that it makes a few things automatable which are already really easy to automate, without any scripting skills at all, and for free, in Automator. Am I missing anything?
Automator + iCal
… [adding], or, I mean, Automator actions tied to iCal events?
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Thanks a lot for the screencasts. I found them very useful.
Another request for more details on various systems
I saw in your excellent screencast that you had some DevonThink Pro databases, Yojimbo, plus a seemly well structured Archive folder.
There’s quite a bit of overlap in what those three systems can do. How do you separate them? How do those storage apps fit into your trusted system? I have all those apps too (plus more like VoodooPad), and I have to admit that I’m floundering between them.
This Kinkless Desktop has been great for explaining a structured system and how to make it work. Hopefully we can get another showing your workflow with those other apps too.
Thanks!
Green Rule
Yes, i think there’s an error in the green rule - the second line should read ‘Date last opened is before date added’ whereas it reads ‘…is after…’ Quite proud to have spotted that… Great series of posts, Ethan, thank you - I wonder how many desktops around the world (I’m in Ireland) are now resembling yours
A
Green Rule Fix
Amber, Maluktuk, Andrew, and everyone else that spotted the Green Rule error… you’re spot on and I’ve fixed the ruleset now and re-uploaded the zip file (link above in article)… Thanks for that catch.
The power of the hive mind in action!
e
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Thu, 2007/05/24 - 3:57pm — rishabh about rule - Delete if older than one day
I don’t understand why is the date added in this rule is “is not in the last 1 day” when it should have been “is in the last 1 day”
Thanks!
Thanks for this series Ethan, its all good stuff.
I have a lot to owe kinkless; If it wasn’t for kGTD I probably wouldn’t have seen the light and purchased my shiny mac laptop. kinkless changed my life #! But really, thanks for this, I really can’t wait to see what else you have for us.
Something I would’ve loved to see more of in this series is how to actually use the folders; and I guess OS X in general.
I love the idea, and I’m already having benefits of not using the desktop as a crap-pile. But it’s like.. ok, so I have a project coming up. It gets a folder in the Archive.. an alias of which goes into Pending. Files coming in go to Inbox.. Which I work with in the Inbox, and later sort into the project folder if it’s useful. Or is this where quicksilver and metadata comes in - tag files related to a project wherever they are, and move on files wherever they stand periodically.
I think I’d just like to watch Ethan use his desktop. Just to do what he does.
Infact, I would love a web app that is people contributing screencasts of them doing what they do.. people can ask questions and give hints for better ways to do.. things. shrug
Re: Thanks!
Dan, really glad to hear that Kinkless has had a positive impact… I’m never sure if the bugs in kGTD outweigh the net benefit ;)
Regarding the folders, you just echoed my own thinking after I finished part 5 of this series. I think i should publish some more information on how to actually use them. I’ve got this in my queue now for further write up.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
You implied in the screencast that you use OmniFocus to track all your tasks. Does that mean, even as an alpha, you’ve found it stable enough to trust? I’m one of the lucky ones with access, and I’m wondering if I should just pull the trigger and import my kinkless document. :)
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Otto, it’s definitely work in progress, but I’m finding it very reliable at this point. Before I install a new alpha build, I do export my database (OmniFocus File menu), delete my old ~/Library/Application Support/OmniFocus directory and then restore from the DB backup after copying over the new alpha. I find that this circumvents some slowdowns I was seeing.
Archive, Devonthink Pro, & Yojimbo?
Jonathan Cisco had a great comment above that I was wondering about as well. I, too, would love to hear more about these apps and how they work into your workflow. I’ve been testing both Devonthink and EagleFiler, and I haven’t settled yet on which app to use. What advantage, if any, have you found with using Yojimbo? I’ll second the motion for a screencast on this!
Thanks
Re: Archive, Devonthink Pro, & Yojimbo?
herbert, I just posted a quick response above and will also be working on a screencast to go along with my article on this…
I have a love/frustration relationship with DEVONThink Pro, but mostly it’s love. I’ve looked at some other apps but I keep coming back to DTP. I’m hoping the 2.0 release, long in the making, addresses some of the issues that 1.x has.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
great stuff, Ethan. And thanks to you, I’ve recently purchased licenses for CandyBar, Pixadex and Hazel. I’m enjoying working with them. The icon stuff doesn’t improve productivity but does improve the aesthetic quality of the computing experience, something I think many of us tend to underestimate.
I’ll add my comments to those above whom are curious about the presence of both DevonThink Pro and Yojimbo. I’m an avid DT Pro user, love it and use it as my information repository. Just makes a perfect archival tool for me but I can’t imagine why I’d also use anything like Yojimbo or EagleFiler at the same time.
Also curious about why you use so many different DT databases, what the rationale there is. I tried that and found that for me it defeated the idea of an archive, one place to dump everything and then use the tool to find it. And still not really sure why you have the DT db files in your archive folder. Is it just because conceptually it makes sense to have them there or do you somehow need them for ready access for some reason?
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Rick, all excellent questions and ones that I my answers to have changed significantly over the past year. I previously had a single large DEVONThink Pro database for pretty much everything. Writing, research, online posts, notes about playing Go, etc. As you are no doubt painfully aware of, DEVONThink Pro is currently limited to a single database being open at a time, so a single DB makes sense to ensure that things are easy to access.
The reason I like DTP is the search facility / semi-AI approach to discovering information in the database. I found that I had a lot of material in the monolithic DB that was coming up on searches when I didn’t want it to (yet I didn’t want to hide that information from indexing entirely). Additionally, I changed the way I used Yojimbo, DTP and Scrivener to capture ideas and draft writing. For a number of reasons related to both search and compartmentalization, I decided to separate my DBs. Overall I’m happy I did.
I’ll include more information about my separate DTP DBs in my article on my use of these primary apps in the coming weeks.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
a couple of other thoughts…
I’d tried the ‘sweep items off desktop into inbox’ rule and got the same result, it moved EVERYTHING.
So it’s not the most elegant approach, but I just created separate folders/rules for each of the folders on my desktop (only have four of em: Action, Archive, Inbox, Read) and used the same ‘label if meets this date criteria’ rules. Then deleted the other rules for desktop and created the one that simply sweeps items off the desktop and into inbox if it’s not named the same as one of my folders, and date modified is older than 5 minutes. So far so good.
And final question: what software do you use to make these videos? You’ve probably mentioned this previously but I missed it.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I agree that this is currently the best approach for a full desktop sweep… compartmentalizing the rules on a per folder basis is less elegant but more sure-to-work.
For information on how I make the screencasts, see the about page which has a brief run down of the apps I’m using to produce them.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Wow! I was waiting to play with hazel and waiting to buy it until I thought of a good reason. Now I have one. This is most excellent.
Is Hazel Playing Badly with Path Finder?
I have just started using Hazel, and the app does not seem to be detecting when I have last opened a file, and acting accordingly (for example: the Inbox “green” rule is non-responsive) . Is it me, or does Hazel play nicely with Path Finder or not?
Does anyone know of any issues?
Thanks.
PathFinder and Other Screencast Suggestions
Ethan,
I also use PathFinder, so I’m very interested in screencasts that focus on workflow, taxonomy, and general organizational and usage patterns within PathFinder. Unfortunately, I don’t have an answer to ikemstar’s question.
One clarification:
Do you not user PathFinder’s desktop or was it simply hidden/deactivated for this screencast series? (I seem to recall a conflict with PathFinder not showing Finder’s Smart Folders.)
I also am interested in a screencast addressing/comparing Yojimbo, DevonThink, EagleFiler, KIT, etc. (especially the notion of proprietary vs. open formats, always being to get one’s data out if needed).
Thank you in advance and for all of your work and contributions.
-John
Re: PathFinder and Other Screencast Suggestions
John, actually I do use Pathfinder’s desktop but for this screencast it was, as you guessed, turned off. The only reason I use Pathfinder’s desktop is to not be endlessly switching between Fnder and Pathfinder. It took me a while to get into daily use of Pathfinder but I do absolutely prefer it now. However there are still a few hiccups in it, one of which is that Pathfinder’s “show info” option is a bit unrefined. E.g. even when “show invisibles” is turned off it will still tell you how many invisible files are in a folder. This is unfortunate since .DS_Store and custom icon files show up in the count and so my otherwise empty desktop folders show up as having 2 items in them in Pathfinder (but not in Finder which “properly” ignores these).
There used to be some problems with Smartfolders not being viewable in Pathfinder, I believe, but with the current release of PF they seem to be working fine. Some occasional issues with smart folders taking an unusually long time to come up in PF, but overall acceptable performance. The caveat here is that the Smart Folders must still, of course, be created in Finder.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Ethan,
Great series! I’ve really enjoyed this, as my desktop has always been one area I’ve had trouble keeping organized. I do have one question though. What is that red suitcasey looking thing with the large mouth in your dock between Yojimbo and DevonThink? Just curious :)
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
That is Mental Case from the talented Drew McCormack. I really think it’s a new genre of application. It’s a little bit flash card, a little bit database, a little bit note taking app. Fills a real need in my trusted system. Article forthcoming :)
e
Additional Screencasts
Ethan,
Also interested in your opinion of Contactizer. Membranophonist’s Ramplings has, as always, some constructive feedback.
http://blog.wilsonet.com/feed/atom/
-John
Re: Additional Screencasts
John, I agree with a lot of what I’ve just scanned through on that link. I like a lot of what Contactizer does (I am a paid and generally happy user) but my single biggest issue with it is performance. When I need an address or when I need to create an address, I want it to happen quickly. Contactizer is often just too slow. That being said, updates come pretty regularly from the developers and I’ve seen a lot of general improvements over the past several months. Hoping that it continues to evolve.
Path Finder "bug"/ conflict with Kinklessness.
It’s a bad kink, too.
Sadly, there is an issue with Path Finder that means with custom icons installed over the top of Path Finder’s, our Inboxes and various others are never “empty”. See the Cocoatech forum here:
http://www.cocoatech.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2539
Path Finder counts certain invisible directories associated with custom icons as items - even if our desktop folders are clearly empty. I think this is an issue with Apple with-holding certain API’s, etc, etc.
Bad news, eh? The Finder is so ugly, after all. So it’s:
Re: Path Finder "bug"/ conflict with Kinklessness.
Yeah, this is definitely annoying. I noted this in a comment above, but basically I accept it and have gone with option 3… The benefits of the Icons outweigh the “mis reporting” (or over-reporting without options to ignore invisibles) in pathfinder.
I do also have some folder labeling going on based on contents of the folder (I haven’t perfected my applescripts here yet, so didn’t include it in the article) which make the item count less important (i.e. if the folder has items inside it gets a label color based on item age).
WARNING-Hazel is disturbingly inconsistent
This series was so great, that I followed all of the recommendations including Hazel. I’m not usually so cavalier about beta software—my loss!! A little background: I am not a programmer, but I understand sequential logic and years ago did quite a bit of AppleScripting—so I’m not clueless. Unfortunately, I have had some BIG problems with Hazel’s inconsistency.
SETUP I keep my archive in a handful of folders that are on my desktop for easy access: My Company, Clients, Skills (development), Topics, and Personal. Within these folders were dozens of subfolders containing a few thousand documents. This week I added the INBOX, OUTBOX, TO SORT (not-quite-no-mercy) and a TODAY smart folder.
On Friday, I ran the first batch of Hazel rules. Pretty cool, it seemed to add colored labels throughout all of my archive folders and INBOX. Before the discussion came up about a rule to clear the desktop, I tried it myself. Because I had seen the explicit rule “Run rules on folder subcontents” in Ethan’s Desktop set, I created a new rule (I added an additional Desktop set first) to move Kind=Document to the Inbox. BIG MISTAKE. I did check the preview, but only saw the files on the desktop, I did not realize that the subfolders could possibly be affected since I did not add that rule. BUT, within a few moments I looked in my Inbox to discover that thousands of diligently sorted documents from all of my archives were now unsorted, loose and red-labeled in my INBOX. Oddly, a handful of remaining documents are sprinkled throughout my archive.
I could have cried. But instead I left town for the (U.S.) holiday weekend. I returned to work today, Tuesday, to try to understand how this happened. I tried out some harmless labeling. But it simply WILL NOT apply labeling to files within subfolders, unless I have the “Run rules on folder subcontents” rule included. Now, I will have to spend a dozen or more hours re-sorting these files. Big lesson learned.
Furthermore, I cannot get Hazel to clear the red and yellow labels that it applied to many but not all subfolders in my archives. At first, I attempted to use Ethan’s complete Desktop rules, but change all of the labels to none (‘x’). This works on documents but not on folders. For some reason, NOW Hazel considers that “Run rules on folder subcontents” takes precedence and it does not run the following rule to change the label. She was willing to label them on Friday, why not today?
UPDATE Paul Kim contacted me personally to let me know that he has addressed these concerns and that his response will show up on this site (as soon as Ethan has a chance to verify that it is not spam). I really appreciate a developer that is this responsive—and will consequently give Hazel another chance.
Re: WARNING-Hazel is *dangerously* inconsistent
Hi jonlittell,
I’m the author of Hazel. I’m sorry about what happened but it seems that there are a few misunderstandings.
By default, rules do not go into subfolders. That is the purpose of the “Run rules on folder contents” action. You have to set up a rule specifically to match the folders you want to descend into because of the potential of messing up nice hierarchies that you created. Ethan did set up such a rule and it does appear you were bit by it. Rules are disabled on import for such a reason; it is important to review and understand any rules that you did not create yourself.
I was curious about the rule preview. It is a very new feature so it’s possible it is buggy but did the files in subfolder not appear or did you not look in the subfolders? Let me know since if it is the former case, I need to fix it. If the latter, then I should maybe look into making it more obvious that there are sub-files/folders.
As for reverting the labels, the folder contents rule matches any folders. Hazel stops processing on the first match (you can check the Apple Help in-app and the FAQ online if you need more elaboration on this). So, since folders match the rule to process its contents, it will not match any subsequent rules. If you want to remove the label on folders, add the action to that rule since it is already matching folders. I’m guessing that you disabled that rule at some point which allowed the folders to match a different rule to color them.
Hazel is in beta but I am not going to use that as an excuse since most of the behavior (excepting the preview feature) is as designed. I believe it ran consistently given that you understand its rules. I do apologize for confusion; if you need any help with undoing them, let me know as I would be happy to oblige.
Re: WARNING-Hazel is disturbingly inconsistent
I ran into a similar situation with Hazel’s label rules and decided to write a quick Automator script to “Clear All Labels”. I found when undoing Hazel it’s better to use Automator, just to steer clear of any Hazel-specific logic. This is no problem of the application itself, and in my case the color labels made sense and I was not upset by their abundance… until I wanted to move something from a “to Delete” folder into my Archive.
So this is how it works — You select the top-level folder in the Finder and Automator will run down into each subfolder x’ing out any remaining red or yellow labels. Here’s what to do:
That’s it! Now, just select the folder you want to clear out all labels from and press Run (or export to an application). Remember, this will undo any labels you have within the directory, reverting it back to the natural Finder state.
Re: PathFinder and other questions
I guess I’ll also answer other questions while I’m here.
Hazel vs Automator+Folder Actions/iCal:
Part of the reason for Hazel is somewhat apparent in the title above. Hazel is one place where the functionality of Automator/Folder Actions/iCal are integrated. Using the aforementioned combination can get messy in terms of working out the filtering (multiple folder actions in the same folder working on different files) and dealing with time based stuff (for instance, if a file changes such that the iCal trigger you set up needs to be cancelled, you have to figure out how you will detect it in time and how to go about canceling it). Other advantages are that Hazel knows about different downloading programs and will not interfere with them before they are finished. In addition, the “Date Added” attribute does not exist in OS X; it is recorded by Hazel so you would also have to deal with management of that meta data. There are other subtle things but those are the main ones.
PathFinder and access times:
I haven’t tested this myself but I did have a user some time ago having a problem with PathFinder w.r.t. the access time on mounted disk images. Apparently, he was using the quick mount feature that, as a shortcut, seemed to not bother updating that time. Hazel doesn’t do anything special with the last opened/access times. If they are not being set properly (double check by doing a “Get Info” on the file), then it is something that needs to be taken up with the authors of PathFinder. Of course, if there is somehow a conflict with Hazel, I’d be more than happy to work with them to resolve it.
“Empty” folders:
Hazel has a “Size” attribute that I’ve tweaked to ignore .DS_Store files. The next release will ignore any files with the invisible bit set. You can access the “Number of Items” via the attribute picker (select “Other…” when selecting the attribute to filter on) but it is the standard one used by Spotlight which does count invisibles. I’m considering having a Hazel version of this attribute that filters them out but I could use some use cases to justify including such a feature. If you have any specific examples, please send them my way.
Also, send me feedback either via email through the site or the beta forum (forums are at http://www.noodlesoft.com/forums). I’ll try and keep up with this thread but the real way to get my attention is to contact me on my site.
Thanks.
Hazel, Workflows, Tinderbox Love
Nice one, Mr. Hazel ;-) We love your sexy, essential little program. It’s the mark of any great work that: a) You think: “Why didn’t I think of that?”, and b) You wonder how you ever managed without it. Excellent.
Will be interesting to see how you handle the Path Finder issue, Ethan - sorry for duplicating your post earlier. The whole psychology of “Inbox Zero” is really important, but hey, we would have no problems if the Finder wasn’t so wrecked. Or different ones.
Don’t we get any love for Tinderbox on this board? In so many ways, I love DevonThink. I wrestled with it for a couple of years before going with Tinderbox, which (for me) is just more flexible and extensible. And here’s the killer: it’s lightweight. And DevonThink is just not that.
Here’s my workflow: 1. Capture: Yojimbo (it’s brainless). This gets moved to: 2. Inbox (can this be scripted?), where it gets processed. Reference materials are moved to: 3. Tinderbox. Reminders are placed into OmniFocus on a “for-review” basis.
I scan all my bills etc as hardcopy as PDFs into Yep (killer app!) which may seem to break the workflow somewhat, but there is some interoperability as I can link any document in it’s database through it’s file path to any Tinderbox note. And Yep is peerless for PDFs. Tagging. You’ll never know how useful their implementation is unless you try it.
Are they doing that in DevonThink, yet? ;-)
Re: Hazel, Workflows, Tinderbox Love
DEVONThink Pro Office has scanning and OCR but I haven’t tried it. I’m waiting to see how DTP2 shapes up before I commit to the office version. I do have Yep in my trial apps list and have played with it. Very nice and I’m considering using it with my wife as a domestic file cabinet (sharing between multiple machines).
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I have set up according to instructions with Inbox etc. I have implemented the Hazel script and it works nearly 100%. It works so far with files I have dropped in the Inbox.
I tried to use it for e-mail drops from Entourage but the colour coding does not seem to work. I am sure it is due to the very nature of the e-mail drop from Entourage. E-mail messages can be action items as well no matter whetheer they contain attachments or not.
One of the big challenges with improvement in management of information is that there are different facilities for information management. E-mail obviously is one of them - it has its own Inbox etc. and now Ethan is proposing a very simple and effective idea for the desktop. I enjoy the simplicity and the functionality but certainly also the beautiful icons. Thanks Ethan!
We need to be able to create some convergence for these separate facilities.
I am sue there is an easy answer to my question
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
We are starting to see some solutions to this issue. Bad solutions like Chandler which try to swallow everything into one application and good solutions like Spotlight which is more glue between apps (in the same vein as applescript). It’s nascent and a lot of the solutions I’ve seen so far (solutions exploiting spotlight for cross-application information management) really only go half way there. It’s a space to watch.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I found that the “Delete empty folders” rules were a tad too aggressive for me - they kept trashing folders just after I created them (to have a little order in my outbox mostly). I appended “Date added - is not in the last - 1 Hour” to both rules to deal with that.
Apart from that, thank you so much for this series. I meant to impose some structure on my desktop, now I finally could!
Displaying keyboard shortcuts as you type them?
Very, very nice tips! I can’t wait for getting my first mac and applying all those useful tricks. I’m wondering… it is the first time I see the keyboard shortcuts appearing on a transparent overlay on the desktop as someone types them. Is this the default feature or do you use an application to perform this?
Re: Displaying keyboard shortcuts as you type them?
See the about page for details.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
In an earlier screencast, you mentioned that you would go over the details of maintaining a good transfer folder that is kept synchronised between systems. Since I have a Mac at home at and work, this is a topic that interests me greatly, and was wondering if it something you intend to address in the future.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Well, just a quick note : Ethan, you really rocks. I mean, first of all I am a mac user for ages, developer for years, and I felt like I had nothing to learn for basic usage of the system. Obviously I was wrong, and I must thank you for this lesson. Thanks for the time you spent on screencasting and publishing your work on the subject, I rarely see such good writings on such simple things, now I feel much more comfortable with my desktop and I owe you that.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Thanks for kGTD and all the great info in this desktop series. I had a couple of quick questions:
Someone might have asked for this already: Could you post just a list of the applications in your dock or that you use frequently? I am pretty new to Macs and the guidance would be a big help.
In your system using the Archive folder to keep stuff, what role does the Documents folder play?
Thanks again.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I really don’t use the documents folder at all due to the number of apps that have decided they can pollute it. I’ll be posting an article about the apps I’m using soon!
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Hi Ethan,
I just stumbled onto your wonderful site and I want to first thank you for the screencasts since they rock =]. Secondly, when I tried to apply Hazel, it seems to be working very adhoc using the ruleset on the site you provided. From my understanding any new items that fall into the Inbox or the desktop should be highlighted green.
I tried downloading zip files, txt, png, jpgs, and other misc files into the Inbox but Hazel doesn’t seem to be highlighting them green. I’m wondering if it’s because I’m running the trial version still of Pixadex and Hazel. I would assume there shouldn’t be a problem though.
Just curious whether anyone else ran into the same issue.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I’ve fully implemented Kinkless Desktop and it (combined with using Omnifocus beta) is doing a lot to help straighten out my chaotic work life. Big thanks !
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Again, great screen casts, but how does all this fit with Omnifocus or kGTD?
Hazel rules turned my folder labels green??
I just created the four folders as in your screencast, moved some files around, installed Hazel, and installed your three sets of rules. It has turned the labels of the four folders green—including the “Archives” alias even though the “skip aliases and saved searches” rule was activated. It shouldn’t act on the folders themselves, should it? Just the contents, no?
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
This sc has been great. Can’t wait to go home and start cleaning up my computer.
Jeff
Organizing supporting documents
I use a lot of supporting documents in my design work, photoshop brushes, actions, gigs of vector artwork that I’ve created over the years and reuse… fonts..
Any recommendations as to how one can manage a good collection of stock materials?
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I have a rather silly question….I noticed in your screencast that all of your smart folders don’t contain the .savedSearch extension at the end of their names. I was wondering, how were you able to change the names without reverting it to an .xml file. I tried single clicking on the name and just removing the .savedSearch extension, but when I did that it changed the folder into an .xml file. Could you show me how you managed to rename the folders please?
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Ethan,
I figured out what I was doing wrong. I had the option to show file extensions enabled in the Finder preferences.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I found your screencast on delicious. It’s literally changing 15 years of file organization for me. Thanks so much!
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Wow, what a great series of screencasts! Thank you ever so much for helping me get a grip on my desktop chaos. Kind regards from Berlin, jan
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
I have downloaded the rules but for some reason cannot get them to apply on my Desktop Subfolders /inbox & downloads. Did I miss something?
The screencast was great and it has helped me work more productively. Thanks for the great work!
Removing color labels on move
Thanks for a great Hazel intro which made me buy Hazel instantly - and I really like it.
I’m using a system very close to the one in the screencast. So I get a clear, visual indication on how long stuff has been sitting on my desktop.
But often the right thing to do about a color-coded file is just to move it - but the color-code (of course) stays although it just makes sense in a desktop/download folder-context.
Does anyone know of a clever way to achieve this with Hazel, alternatively Automator?
I could decide to just get Hazel to remove any grren/yellow/red colros from any files outside the two folders mentioned above, but I’m hoping something more elegant is possible.
Hope I didn’t miss anything in the many comments.
DownThemAll and Green Labels
Anyone using DownThemAll for their downloads in Firefox? I download everything into my inbox, but when I make DTA handle it (which I usually do), the files never seem to get the green label. Is it just me, or perhaps DTA does something to the files on download that makes them seem accessed?
Re: DownThemAll and Green Labels
Actually, after a bit more testing, it seems that it’s not just DTA. I don’t see any pattern in this, but only a few downloaded files get the label, but not all. This is using the rules from the updated zip file, unchanged.
Re: Redundant "Today"s?
Just an observation - isn’t the “Today” Desktop smart folder Ethan suggests redundant? The new 10.5 Finder has “Today” search built into the default sidebar already. Are the advantages of having it on your desktop vs. clicking the finder in the Dock?
This is great stuff, Ethan, already feeling lighter and more intuitive workflow happening. OmniFocus is fantastic.
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Great series! Very useful for me (particularly the custom icons), and hopefully helpful to my wife if I can get her to watch :)
I was wondering, what did you use to create the screencasts? I need to create some screencasts myself and these look great. Thanks!
Re: Kinkless Desktop 5: Cruelty can be kind
Pretty informative, thanks a lot! Voice quality is absolutely fine :)
I wish you dealt more with duplicate files. You never touched that option if I recall correctly. My iTunes library got so many duplicates and iTunes finds them but doesn’t delete them and I don’t want to do it manually. Same with iPhoto pictures, please advise :)
Thanks again!
Post new comment